
The best states for nurse practitioners can seem relative. If your needs are met and you’re happy, your state might be the best for you. But some NPs might job search based on industry data that reveal some of the factors that qualify a state as being “the best.” And we’ve gathered some info that could help.
The latest employment data, referenced in this article, show that not only are nurse practitioner skills in high demand across the country but the lowest median salary is over $100,000, and job growth rates for NPs are increasing everywhere. Even better? More states are granting NPs full practice authority. Now, the only question you need to answer is: do you stay where you are, or do you move someplace else?
To help you figure this out, we collected data and rankings for each state along 5 metrics that play a key role in an NP’s professional and personal lives:
Together, all these pieces of information can help give you a better idea of what states would be most ideal for you to live and work, based on your priorities and preferences.
Below, we provide you with a high-level summary of the best and worst states for NPs in 2026 across those five key metrics. If you want to dig deeper into the data, we also provide detailed explanations of how each metric was calculated, along with state-by-state rankings for all 50 states.
See full state-by-state rankings.
For your skimming pleasure, here’s a high-level summary of the best and worst states for NPs in 2026 across the five key metrics.
The 5 Highest-Paying States for Nurse Practitioners |
|---|
| 1. California: $173,190 |
| 2. New York: $148,410 |
| 3. Oregon: $148,030 |
| 4. Massachusetts: $145,140 |
| 5. Washington: $143,620 |
The 5 Lowest-Paying States for Nurse Practitioners |
| 46. Kentucky: $116,930 |
| 47. Arkansas: $116,030 |
| 48. South Carolina: $113,950 |
| 49. Alabama: $109,650 |
| 50. Tennessee: $108,180 |
The 5 Most Affordable States for Nurse Practitioners |
|---|
| 1. Arkansas |
| 2. Mississippi |
| 3. West Virginia |
| 4. South Dakota |
| 5. Oklahoma |
The 5 Least Affordable States for Nurse Practitioners |
| 46. Washington |
| 47. Massachusetts |
| 48. Hawaii |
| 49. New Jersey |
| 50. California |
The 5 States With the Highest Projected Demand for Nurse Practitioners |
|---|
| 1. California |
| 2. Texas |
| 3. Florida |
| 4. Tennessee |
| 5. New York |
The 5 States With the Lowest Projected Demand for Nurse Practitioners |
| 46. Vermont |
| 47. North Dakota |
| 48. Hawaii |
| 49. Wyoming |
| 50. Alaska |
The 5 Best States for Nurse Practitioners’ Quality of Life |
|---|
| 1. Utah |
| 2. New Hampshire |
| 3. Idaho |
| 4. Minnesota |
| 5. Nebraska |
The 5 Worst States for Nurse Practitioners’ Quality of Life |
| 46. West Virginia |
| 47. New Mexico |
| 48. Mississippi |
| 49. Alaska |
| 50. Louisiana |
The Best States for Nurse Practitioners: Full Practice Authority |
|
|---|---|
| Alaska | Arizona |
| Colorado | Connecticut |
| Delaware | District of Columbia |
| Hawaii | Idaho |
| Iowa | Kansas |
| Maine | Maryland |
| Montana | Nebraska |
| Nevada | New Hampshire |
| New Mexico | New York |
| North Dakota | Oregon |
| Rhode Island | South Dakota |
| Utah | Vermont |
| Washington | Wyoming |
The Worst States for Nurse Practitioners: Restricted Practice Authority States |
|
| California | Florida |
| Georgia | Michigan |
| Missouri | North Carolina |
| Oklahoma | South Carolina |
| Tennessee | Texas |
| Virginia | — |
Source: American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP), “State Practice Environment” (last accessed October 2025).

It goes without saying that money is a great motivator, particularly when it comes to making career-related decisions. That said, nurse practitioner salaries tend to vary (and sometimes significantly) from state to state. To show you what your earning potential could be in each state, we’ve shared the latest BLS salary data for NPs below. (Keep in mind that all BLS data reflects the employment and wage numbers for NPs as of May 2024.)
Note that we excluded Nevada because BLS didn’t have salary estimates available for the state.
Rank |
State |
Average Annual Salary for Nurse Practitioners |
Average Hourly Pay for Nurse Practitioners |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | $173,190 | $83.26 |
| 2 | New York | $148,410 | $71.35 |
| 3 | Oregon | $148,030 | $71.17 |
| 4 | Massachusetts | $145,140 | $69.78 |
| 5 | Washington | $143,620 | $69.05 |
| 6 | Alaska | $142,340 | $68.43 |
| 7 | Connecticut | $141,140 | $67.85 |
| 8 | New Jersey | $140,470 | $67.54 |
| 9 | Rhode Island | $139,600 | $67.11 |
| 10 | New Mexico | $136,620 | $65.68 |
| 11 | Hawaii | $135,020 | $64.91 |
| 12 | New Hampshire | $133,660 | $64.26 |
| 13 | Iowa | $133,020 | $63.95 |
| 14 | Arizona | $132,920 | $63.90 |
| 15 | Utah | $131,680 | $63.31 |
| 16 | Montana | $131,560 | $63.25 |
| 17 | Idaho | $131,380 | $63.16 |
| 18 | Texas | $130,930 | $62.95 |
| 19 | Vermont | $130,580 | $62.78 |
| 20 | Wisconsin | $130,490 | $62.74 |
| 21 | Delaware | $130,190 | $62.59 |
| 22 | Illinois | $128,880 | $61.96 |
| 23 | Florida | $128,340 | $61.70 |
| 24 | Minnesota | $128,120 | $61.60 |
| 25 | Nebraska | $127,950 | $61.51 |
| 26 | Kansas | $127,900 | $61.49 |
| 27 | Maine | $127,750 | $61.42 |
| 28 | Colorado | $127,610 | $61.35 |
| 29 | Michigan | $127,200 | $61.15 |
| 30 | Oklahoma | $127,120 | $61.12 |
| 31 | Maryland | $127,100 | $61.11 |
| 32 | Pennsylvania | $126,730 | $60.93 |
| 33 | Indiana | $126,520 | $60.83 |
| 34 | Wyoming | $126,060 | $60.60 |
| 35 | Georgia | $125,490 | $60.33 |
| 36 | Louisiana | $124,850 | $60.02 |
| 37 | North Carolina | $124,830 | $60.01 |
| 38 | Missouri | $124,600 | $59.90 |
| 39 | Mississippi | $122,930 | $59.10 |
| 40 | South Dakota | $122,300 | $58.80 |
| 41 | Virginia | $122,180 | $58.74 |
| 42 | West Virginia | $122,140 | $58.72 |
| 43 | Ohio | $121,250 | $58.29 |
| 44 | North Dakota | $121,200 | $58.27 |
| 45 | Kentucky | $116,930 | $56.22 |
| 46 | Arkansas | $116,030 | $55.79 |
| 47 | South Carolina | $113,950 | $54.79 |
| 48 | Alabama | $109,650 | $52.72 |
| 49 | Tennessee | $108,180 | $52.01 |

Of course, no conversation around salary can be complete without also taking into account the cost of living for a given area.
If you have a high-paying job in a state that tends to have a very high cost of living, then you would expect to see most (if not all) of your paycheck going toward your living expenses. But, if you had an average salary in a state with a low cost of living, you’d be more likely to have some money left over to spend however you wanted.
To help you get a better picture of your earning potential in different states, we turned to U.S. News’ 2025 Affordability Rankings, part of its larger Overall Best States of 2025 ranking (more on this later).
To determine how affordable each state was, U.S. News gave them scores on two metrics: cost of living and housing affordability. Below, you’ll find U.S. News’ Affordability rankings for all 50 states, with 1 being the most affordable, and 50 being the least. along with their respective scores across the two metrics.
Overall Rank |
State |
Cost of Living Score |
Housing Affordability Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arkansas | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | Mississippi | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | West Virginia | 8 | 2 |
| 4 | South Dakota | 3 | 6 |
| 5 | Oklahoma | 4 | 7 |
| 6 | Louisiana | 5 | 8 |
| 7 | Iowa | 7 | 9 |
| 8 | Alabama | 10 | 4 |
| 9 | North Dakota | 6 | 11 |
| 10 | Kentucky | 14 | 5 |
| 11 | Kansas | 9 | 10 |
| 12 | Nebraska | 12 | 15 |
| 13 | New Mexico | 13 | 16 |
| 14 | Missouri | 17 | 12 |
| 15 | Montana | 11 | 18 |
| 16 | Ohio | 18 | 14 |
| 17 | Wyoming | 15 | 17 |
| 18 | Indiana | 19 | 13 |
| 19 | Tennessee | 20 | 19 |
| 20 | Wisconsin | 21 | 20 |
| 21 | Idaho | 16 | 27 |
| 22 | South Carolina | 22 | 23 |
| 23 | Michigan | 24 | 21 |
| 24 | North Carolina | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | Vermont | 26 | 25 |
| 26 | Maine | 29 | 22 |
| 27 | Georgia | 27 | 28 |
| 28 | Pennsylvania | 31 | 26 |
| 29 | Minnesota | 32 | 29 |
| 30 | Texas | 30 | 32 |
| 31 | Utah | 25 | 36 |
| 32 | Illinois | 33 | 30 |
| 33 | Delaware | 34 | 33 |
| 34 | Nevada | 28 | 39 |
| 35 | Alaska | 39 | 31 |
| 36 | Rhode Island | 38 | 34 |
| 37 | Virginia | 35 | 35 |
| 38 | Arizona | 36 | 37 |
| 39 | Oregon | 43 | 38 |
| 40 | Connecticut | 41 | 41 |
| 41 | Maryland | 42 | 42 |
| 42 | New Hampshire | 44 | 40 |
| 43 | Colorado | 37 | 48 |
| 44 | Florida | 40 | 44 |
| 45 | New York | 45 | 43 |
| 46 | Washington | 47 | 45 |
| 47 | Massachusetts | 46 | 47 |
| 48 | Hawaii | 48 | 46 |
| 49 | New Jersey | 49 | 49 |
| 50 | California | 50 | 50 |
The more job openings there are, the greater the need there is for a specific profession. This is particularly true for NPs, who should expect to see the number of available jobs increase by about 35% by 2034. (This should translate to about 134,000 new jobs opening up during that time.)
The only problem is that this significant job growth won’t be spread equally across the U.S. Naturally, some states will see higher rates of job growth than others. Below, we’ve shared occupational projection numbers from Projections Central to show you how much demand there will be for NPs on a state-by-state basis between now and 2032, both in terms of raw job opening numbers and job growth percentage.
You’ll notice that there are some two-way ties in the number of job openings. Within those tied pairs, we ranked them based on who had the higher job growth percentage.
Overall Rank |
State |
Average Annual Job Openings |
Job Growth Percentage (2022–2032) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arizona | 860 | 71.1% |
| 2 | New Mexico | 200 | 64.8% |
| 3 | Arkansas | 360 | 61.3% |
| 4 | South Carolina | 490 | 60.7% |
| 5 | Utah | 430 | 60.3% |
| 6 | Idaho | 110 | 60% |
| 7 | Texas | 2240 | 60% |
| 8 | California | 2500 | 58.6% |
| 9 | Florida | 2190 | 58.5% |
| 10 | Georgia | 910 | 58.2% |
| 11 | Tennessee | 1570 | 57.9% |
| 12 | Colorado | 420 | 56.2% |
| 13 | South Dakota | 90 | 56.1% |
| 14 | Virginia | 800 | 55.6% |
| 15 | North Carolina | 920 | 55.5% |
| 16 | Montana | 110 | 55.2% |
| 17 | Delaware | 110 | 55% |
| 18 | Iowa | 260 | 52.9% |
| 19 | Oregon | 240 | 52.7% |
| 20 | West Virginia | 180 | 52.3% |
| 21 | Nevada | 200 | 51.1% |
| 22 | Wisconsin | 530 | 51.1% |
| 23 | New Hampshire | 160 | 50.7% |
| 24 | New Jersey | 720 | 50.7% |
| 25 | Alabama | 480 | 50% |
| 26 | Hawaii | 50 | 48.9% |
| 27 | North Dakota | 60 | 48.3% |
| 28 | Wyoming | 50 | 47.9% |
| 29 | Massachusetts | 280 | 46.9% |
| 30 | Indiana | 660 | 45.8% |
| 31 | Kentucky | 470 | 45.2% |
| 32 | Rhode Island | 140 | 45.1% |
| 33 | Washington | 600 | 45.1% |
| 34 | Connecticut | 310 | 44.8% |
| 35 | Minnesota | 550 | 43.8% |
| 36 | Louisiana | 440 | 43.6% |
| 37 | Kansas | 310 | 42.9% |
| 38 | Pennsylvania | 770 | 42.7% |
| 39 | Mississippi | 400 | 42.6% |
| 40 | Ohio | 1060 | 42.6% |
| 41 | Maryland | 500 | 42.2% |
| 42 | Missouri | 720 | 41.9% |
| 43 | Michigan | 700 | 41.2% |
| 44 | Illinois | 850 | 41.1% |
| 45 | Oklahoma | 280 | 38.6% |
| 46 | Nebraska | 160 | 35.8% |
| 47 | Vermont | 70 | 35.8% |
| 48 | Maine | 120 | 35.3% |
| 49 | New York | 440 | 26.3% |
| 50 | Alaska | 30 | 10% |

Once we got a better understanding of what each state could offer NPs as far as earning potential, job growth, and cost of living, we decided to find out the kind of quality of life NPs could expect to have in each area. To do this, we turned to U.S. News’ 2025 Best States Rankings, which considered a whole host of natural and social environment factors on a state-by-state basis. They determined each state’s rank by first scoring them along the following 8 metrics:
The scores were on a scale of 1 to 50, with 1 being the best and 50 best the worst. They then used those scores to provide an overall ranking for each state. (You can read more about their methodology.) Below, we’ve provided you with quality-of-life rankings for all 50 states, along with their scores for each of the eight individual metrics.
Overall Rank |
State |
Healthcare Score |
Education Score |
Economy Score |
Infrastructure Score |
Opportunity Score |
Fiscal Stability Score |
Crime & Corrections Score |
Natural Environment Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utah | 14 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 1 | 7 | 48 |
| 2 | New Hampshire | 12 | 16 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 37 | 1 | 4 |
| 3 | Idaho | 20 | 29 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 4 | Minnesota | 16 | 11 | 28 | 10 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 14 |
| 5 | Nebraska | 23 | 13 | 29 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 18 | 11 |
| 6 | Florida | 21 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 47 | 9 | 13 | 12 |
| 7 | Vermont | 19 | 23 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 41 | 4 | 9 |
| 8 | South Dakota | 46 | 8 | 13 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 34 | 5 |
| 9 | Massachusetts | 2 | 5 | 11 | 39 | 41 | 36 | 5 | 3 |
| 10 | Washington | 15 | 9 | 23 | 7 | 40 | 16 | 33 | 7 |
| 11 | Colorado | 9 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 33 | 43 | 47 | 16 |
| 12 | North Dakota | 31 | 28 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 17 | 28 | 17 |
| 13 | North Carolina | 25 | 12 | 7 | 32 | 18 | 14 | 25 | 26 |
| 14 | Iowa | 27 | 20 | 44 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 29 |
| 15 | Connecticut | 3 | 10 | 8 | 27 | 43 | 48 | 8 | 15 |
| 16 | Virginia | 18 | 15 | 10 | 38 | 25 | 23 | 12 | 19 |
| 17 | Wisconsin | 26 | 7 | 27 | 31 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 25 |
| 18 | Delaware | 10 | 35 | 21 | 21 | 15 | 2 | 32 | 42 |
| 19 | New Jersey | 5 | 1 | 31 | 12 | 45 | 49 | 10 | 28 |
| 20 | Maryland | 6 | 21 | 35 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 30 | 2 |
| 21 | Georgia | 37 | 27 | 18 | 13 | 32 | 5 | 22 | 20 |
| 22 | New York | 8 | 17 | 41 | 34 | 9 | 3 | 24 | 6 |
| 23 | Wyoming | 39 | 6 | 22 | 26 | 21 | 30 | 23 | 13 |
| 24 | Rhode Island | 4 | 38 | 16 | 45 | 24 | 45 | 6 | 8 |
| 25 | Kansas | 33 | 18 | 34 | 6 | 5 | 32 | 35 | 43 |
| 26 | Montana | 42 | 22 | 20 | 25 | 13 | 19 | 37 | 27 |
| 27 | Maine | 28 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 3 | 29 | 2 | 22 |
| 28 | Hawaii | 1 | 26 | 48 | 49 | 34 | 40 | 3 | 1 |
| 29 | Texas | 32 | 25 | 2 | 18 | 48 | 12 | 40 | 46 |
| 30 | Arizona | 13 | 42 | 5 | 17 | 44 | 35 | 26 | 38 |
| 31 | Missouri | 43 | 33 | 25 | 37 | 11 | 11 | 43 | 18 |
| 32 | Tennessee | 41 | 31 | 24 | 23 | 22 | 7 | 45 | 34 |
| 33 | Indiana | 35 | 19 | 40 | 20 | 16 | 33 | 21 | 50 |
| 34 | Nevada | 36 | 37 | 9 | 4 | 38 | 28 | 41 | 47 |
| 35 | Oregon | 17 | 41 | 37 | 5 | 39 | 22 | 44 | 44 |
| 36 | Illinois | 24 | 14 | 42 | 22 | 35 | 50 | 15 | 45 |
| 37 | California | 7 | 24 | 32 | 35 | 50 | 42 | 38 | 24 |
| 38 | Ohio | 34 | 30 | 39 | 30 | 17 | 25 | 31 | 41 |
| 39 | Kentucky | 45 | 32 | 46 | 24 | 20 | 34 | 11 | 23 |
| 40 | South Carolina | 30 | 43 | 14 | 36 | 42 | 20 | 42 | 21 |
| 41 | Pennsylvania | 11 | 39 | 38 | 43 | 29 | 39 | 17 | 40 |
| 42 | Oklahoma | 48 | 48 | 19 | 29 | 30 | 21 | 36 | 37 |
| 43 | Michigan | 22 | 45 | 33 | 44 | 23 | 38 | 39 | 32 |
| 44 | Arkansas | 47 | 36 | 26 | 41 | 28 | 15 | 48 | 35 |
| 45 | Alabama | 40 | 44 | 36 | 33 | 26 | 31 | 29 | 33 |
| 46 | West Virginia | 49 | 47 | 47 | 50 | 8 | 24 | 19 | 36 |
| 47 | New Mexico | 38 | 50 | 43 | 42 | 37 | 26 | 49 | 30 |
| 48 | Mississippi | 50 | 34 | 49 | 47 | 31 | 47 | 20 | 31 |
| 49 | Alaska | 29 | 49 | 45 | 46 | 36 | 44 | 46 | 39 |
| 50 | Louisiana | 44 | 46 | 50 | 48 | 46 | 46 | 50 | 49 |
Practice authority is the amount of restriction and oversight an NP needs to practice in any given state — and each state’s laws and regulations will differ. The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) categorizes state practice environments into three groups:
Currently, most U.S. states give NPs full practice authority, but there are still a considerable number that don’t. Here’s how it breaks down:
Full Practice Authority States |
|
|---|---|
| Alaska | Arizona |
| Colorado | Connecticut |
| Delaware | District of Columbia |
| Hawaii | Idaho |
| Iowa | Kansas |
| Maine | Maryland |
| Massachusetts | Minnesota |
| Montana | Nebraska |
| Nevada | New Hampshire |
| New Mexico | New York |
| North Dakota | Oregon |
| Rhode Island | South Dakota |
| Utah | Vermont |
| Washington | Wyoming |
Reduced Practice Authority States |
|
| Alabama | Arkansas |
| Illinois | Indiana |
| Kentucky | Louisiana |
| Kentucky | Louisiana |
| Mississippi | New Jersey |
| Ohio | Pennsylvania |
| West Virginia | Wisconsin |
Restricted Practice Authority States |
|
| California | Florida |
| Georgia | Michigan |
| Missouri | North Carolina |
| Oklahoma | South Carolina |
| Tennessee | Texas |
| Virginia | — |
Here is an aggregated list of the overall best and worst states for nurse practitioners based on all the key points discussed above.
State |
Affordability (Overall) |
Salary (Annual Mean Wage) |
Quality of Life |
Job Demand (% Growth) |
Practice Authority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | #08 | $109,650 | #45 | 50.00% | Reduced |
| Alaska | #35 | $142,340 | #49 | 10.00% | Full |
| Arizona | #38 | $132,920 | #30 | 71.10% | Full |
| Arkansas | #01 | $116,030 | #44 | 61.30% | Reduced |
| California | #50 | $173,190 | #37 | 58.60% | Restricted |
| Colorado | #43 | $127,610 | #11 | 56.20% | Full |
| Connecticut | #40 | $141,140 | #15 | 44.80% | Full |
| Delaware | #33 | $130,190 | #18 | 55.00% | Full |
| Florida | #44 | $128,340 | #06 | 58.50% | Restricted |
| Georgia | #27 | $125,490 | #21 | 58.20% | Restricted |
| Hawaii | #48 | $135,020 | #28 | 48.90% | Full |
| Idaho | #21 | $131,380 | #03 | 60.00% | Full |
| Illinois | #32 | $128,880 | #36 | 41.10% | Reduced |
| Indiana | #18 | $126,520 | #33 | 45.80% | Reduced |
| Iowa | #07 | $133,020 | #14 | 52.90% | Full |
| Kansas | #11 | $127,900 | #25 | 42.90% | Full |
| Kentucky | #10 | $116,930 | #39 | 45.20% | Reduced |
| Louisiana | #06 | $124,850 | #50 | 43.60% | Reduced |
| Maine | #26 | $127,750 | #27 | 35.30% | Full |
| Maryland | #41 | $127,100 | #20 | 42.20% | Full |
| Massachusetts | #47 | $145,140 | #09 | 46.90% | Full |
| Michigan | #23 | $127,200 | #43 | 41.20% | Restricted |
| Minnesota | #29 | $128,120 | #04 | 43.80% | Full |
| Mississippi | #02 | $122,930 | #48 | 42.60% | Reduced |
| Missouri | #14 | $124,600 | #31 | 41.90% | Restricted |
| Montana | #15 | $131,560 | #26 | 55.20% | Full |
| Nebraska | #12 | $127,950 | #05 | 35.80% | Full |
| Nevada | #34 | No Salary Data Available | #34 | 51.10% | Full |
| New Hampshire | #42 | $133,660 | #02 | 50.70% | Full |
| New Jersey | #49 | $140,470 | #19 | 50.70% | Reduced |
| New Mexico | #13 | $136,620 | #47 | 64.80% | Full |
| New York | #45 | $148,410 | #22 | 26.30% | Full |
| North Carolina | #24 | $124,830 | #13 | 55.50% | Restricted |
| North Dakota | #09 | $121,200 | #12 | 48.30% | Full |
| Ohio | #16 | $121,250 | #38 | 42.60% | Reduced |
| Oklahoma | #05 | $127,120 | #42 | 38.60% | Reduced |
| Oregon | #39 | $148,030 | #35 | 52.70% | Full |
| Pennsylvania | #28 | $126,730 | #41 | 42.70% | Restricted |
| Rhode Island | #36 | $139,600 | #24 | 45.10% | Full |
| South Carolina | #22 | $113,950 | #40 | 60.70% | Restricted |
| South Dakota | #04 | $122,300 | #08 | 56.10% | Full |
| Tennessee | #19 | $108,180 | #32 | 57.90% | Restricted |
| Texas | #30 | $130,930 | #29 | 60.00% | Restricted |
| Utah | #31 | $131,680 | #01 | 60.30% | Full |
| Vermont | #25 | $130,580 | #07 | 35.80% | Full |
| Virginia | #37 | $122,180 | #16 | 55.60% | Restricted |
| Washington | #46 | $143,620 | #10 | 45.10% | Full |
| West Virginia | #03 | $122,140 | #46 | 52.30% | Reduced |
| Wisconsin | #20 | $130,490 | #17 | 51.10% | Reduced |
| Wyoming | #17 | $126,060 | #23 | 47.90% | Full |
To arrive at our results, we pulled the latest available data from four sources: the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics Query System (2024), U.S. News Affordability and Best States rankings (2025), American Association of Nurse Practitioners Practice Map (2025), and the Projections Central database (2022–2032).
Here’s the data we got from each source:
Ready to protect yourself? Berxi makes it easy to get the coverage you need with policies designed specifically for nurse practitioners. Plus, when you buy direct from Berxi, you can save up to 20% on your premium. Get a quote today — and get yourself peace of mind too.
Image courtesy of iStock.com/Warchi
Image courtesy of iStock.com/andreswd
Image courtesy of iStock.com/SolStock
Image courtesy of iStock.com/urbazon
Last updated on Nov 14, 2025.
Originally published on Mar 01, 2021.
More:
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Berxi™ or Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company. This article (subject to change without notice) is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute professional advice. Click here to read our full disclaimer
The product descriptions provided here are only brief summaries and may be changed without notice. The full coverage terms and details, including limitations and exclusions, are contained in the insurance policy. If you have questions about coverage available under our plans, please review the policy or contact us at 833-242-3794 or support@berxi.com. “20% savings” is based on industry pricing averages.
Berxi™ is a part of Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance (BHSI). Insurance products are distributed through Berkshire Hathaway Global Insurance Services, California License # 0K09397. BHSI is part of Berkshire Hathaway’s National Indemnity group of insurance companies, consisting of National Indemnity and its affiliates, which hold financial strength ratings of A++ from AM Best and AA+ from Standard & Poor’s. The rating scales can be found at www.ambest.com and www.standardandpoors.com, respectively.
No warranty, guarantee, or representation, either expressed or implied, is made as to the correctness, accuracy, completeness, adequacy, or sufficiency of any representation or information. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.
The information on this web site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment, and does not purport to establish a standard of care under any circumstances. All content, including text, graphics, images and information, contained on or available through this web site is for general information purposes only based upon the information available at the time of presentation, and does not constitute medical, legal, regulatory, compliance, financial, professional, or any other advice.
BHSI makes no representation and assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy of information contained on or available through this web site, and such information is subject to change without notice. You are encouraged to consider and confirm any information obtained from or through this web site with other sources, and review all information regarding any medical condition or treatment with your physician or medical care provider. NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.
BHSI is not a medical organization, and does not recommend, endorse or make any representation about the efficacy, appropriateness or suitability of any specific tests, products, procedures, treatments, services, opinions, health care providers or other information contained on or available through this web site. BHSI IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FOR, ANY ADVICE, COURSE OF TREATMENT, DIAGNOSIS OR ANY OTHER SERVICES OR PRODUCTS THAT YOU OBTAIN AFTER REVIEWING THIS WEB SITE.
Click to collapse disclamerWant Berxi articles delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for our monthly newsletter below!
"*" indicates required fields